Car comparison

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0vsQiantu K50 78.84 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW M4 (F82)

3.0

431 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2014-2020
VS

Qiantu K50

78.84 kWh

430 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2018-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    431 hp
    321 kW
  • Lightest
    1,537 kg
    3,389 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    280 hp/t
    209 kW/t
    3.6 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    445 L
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    79/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWM4 (F82)3.0QiantuK5078.84 kWh
Power
431hp321kW
430hp321kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
680Nm502lb-ft
Curb weight
1,537kg3,389lb
1,960kg4,321lb
Gross weight
2,040kg4,497lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
53.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
46.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.1s
4.6s
0-200 km/h
14.0s
Calculated
24.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.9s
Calculated
4.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.2s
Calculated
13.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb
Calculated
219hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
358Nm/t239lb-ft/ton
Calculated
347Nm/t232lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
723km449mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
2,979cc182cu in
-
Length
4,671mm184in
4,634mm182in
Width
1,870mm74in
2,069mm81in
Height
1,383mm54in
1,253mm49in
Wheelbase
2,812mm111in
2,650mm104in
Front track
1,579mm62in
1,798mm71in
Rear track
1,603mm63in
1,791mm71in
Ground clearance
121mm5in
103mm4in
Trunk volume
445L
65L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
60L
-
CO2 emissions
194g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWM4 (F82)3.0QiantuK5078.84 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.9 s
4.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.1 s
4.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.0 s
24.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
8.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.2 s
10.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.2 s
13.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
189 km/h
117 mph
169 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
431 hp
321 kW
QiantuK5078.84 kWh
430 hp
321 kW

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 has 1 hp more than Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh and BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
QiantuK5078.84 kWh
680 Nm
502 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
1,537 kg
3,389 lb
QiantuK5078.84 kWh
1,960 kg
4,321 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
QiantuK5078.84 kWh
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)3.04.1 s
QiantuK5078.84 kWh4.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 and Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
280 hp/t
209 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
QiantuK5078.84 kWh
219 hp/t
164 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
431 hp
321 kW
4.1 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
QiantuK5078.84 kWh
430 hp
321 kW
4.6 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Power
431 hp
321 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,671 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in
QiantuK5078.84 kWh
Power
430 hp
321 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
65 L
2.3 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,253 mm
49.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWM4 (F82)3.0QiantuK5078.84 kWh
Power
431 hp
321 kW
430 hp
321 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.1 s
4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,537 kg
3,389 lb
1,960 kg
4,321 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,671 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
65 L
2.3 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,253 mm
49.3 in
Range score
723 km
449 mi
-
CO2 score
194 g/km
-
Trunk score
445 L
15.7 cu ft
65 L
2.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
280 hp/t
209 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
219 hp/t
164 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M4 (F82) 3.0
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 423 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 61 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 380 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh

  • Has 130 Nm more

Pros

  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 vs Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster