BMW M4 (F82)
Car comparison
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0vsQiantu K50 78.84 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonQiantu K50
78.84 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful431 hp321 kW
- Lightest1,537 kg3,389 lb
- Best power-to-weight280 hp/t209 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | QiantuK5078.84 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 431hp321kW | 430hp321kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,537kg3,389lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 46.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.0s Calculated | 24.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated | 219hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 358Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated | 347Nm/t232lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 723km449mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | - |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 4,634mm182in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 2,069mm81in |
| Height | 1,383mm54in | 1,253mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,798mm71in |
| Rear track | 1,603mm63in | 1,791mm71in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | 103mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 65L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 194g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | QiantuK5078.84 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.0 s | 24.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 117 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 430 hp 321 kW |
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 has 1 hp more than Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh and BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 1,537 kg 3,389 lb |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 1,960 kg 4,321 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 4.1 s |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 and Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 430 hp 321 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 (F82)3.0 | QiantuK5078.84 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 431 hp 321 kW | 430 hp 321 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,537 kg 3,389 lb | 1,960 kg 4,321 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 723 km 449 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 194 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 65 L 2.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 423 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 61 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 380 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh
- Has 130 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























