Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8vsFord Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018

AMG C 63 V8

476 hp3982 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2018-2023
VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E

GT 98.7 kWh

487 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2020-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh

  • Most powerful
    487 hp
    363 kW
  • Highest torque
    830 Nm
    612 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    402 L
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best practicality score
    67/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
476hp355kW
487hp363kW
Torque
650Nm479lb-ft
830Nm612lb-ft
Curb weight
1,735kg3,825lb
2,273kg5,011lb
Gross weight
2,155kg4,751lb
2,717kg5,990lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
49.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
49.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.0s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
13.3s
Calculated
25.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.8s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.0s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
274hp/t205kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
375Nm/t251lb-ft/ton
Calculated
365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
653km406mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
-
Length
4,751mm187in
4,743mm187in
Width
1,877mm74in
1,881mm74in
Height
1,401mm55in
1,613mm64in
Wheelbase
2,840mm112in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,636mm64in
1,622mm64in
Rear track-
1,630mm64in
Ground clearance
101mm4in
130mm5in
Trunk volume
355L
402L
Max trunk volume-
1,420L
Doors
2
5
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
66L
-
CO2 emissions
230g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.8 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.0 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.3 s
25.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.1 s
10.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.0 s
12.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
192 km/h
119 mph
168 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8
476 hp
355 kW
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
487 hp
363 kW

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has 11 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
830 Nm
612 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
2,273 kg
5,011 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V84.0 s
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh4.4 s

Although Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 0.4 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8
274 hp/t
205 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8
476 hp
355 kW
4.0 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
487 hp
363 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8
Power
476 hp
355 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
355 L
12.5 cu ft
Length
4,751 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,401 mm
55.2 in
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
487 hp
363 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,743 mm
186.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
476 hp
355 kW
487 hp
363 kW
Torque
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
830 Nm
612 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.0 s
4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
2,273 kg
5,011 lb
Fuel consumption
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
355 L
12.5 cu ft
Length
4,751 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,401 mm
55.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,743 mm
186.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in
Range score
653 km
406 mi
-
CO2 score
230 g/km
-
Trunk score
355 L
12.5 cu ft
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
274 hp/t
205 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8
Consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.68 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.45 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,651 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8

  • Is 538 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 60 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Has 180 Nm more
  • Has 47 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 V8
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AMG C 63 V8
AMG C 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8
GT 98.7 kWh
Dark Horse 5.0 V8
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsFordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
AMG C 63 V8
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
GT 98.7 kWh
S 95 kWh
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsAUDIe-tron SportbackS 95 kWh
AMG C 63 V8
AMG C 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8
GT 98.7 kWh
AMG GLC 63 V8
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 V8
AMG C 63 V8
AMG C 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
GT 98.7 kWh
S 560
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017S 560
AMG C 63 V8
AMG C 43
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43
GT 98.7 kWh
90 kWh
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsLexusLF-Z Electrified Concept90 kWh
AMG C 63 V8
AMG C 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 V8
GT 98.7 kWh
3.0
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsBMWM4 (G82)3.0
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster