Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) · Facelift 2017 S 560vsFord Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang Mach-E
GT 98.7 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Most powerful487 hp363 kW
- Highest torque830 Nm612 lb-ft
- Largest trunk402 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best practicality score67/100
Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) Facelift 2017 S 560
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,060 kg4,542 lb
- Best power-to-weight228 hp/t170 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017S 560 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 469hp350kW | 487hp363kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 830Nm612lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | 2,273kg5,011lb |
| Gross weight | 2,640kg5,820lb | 2,717kg5,990lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 49.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.0s Calculated | 25.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 228hp/t170kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 340Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated | 365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 889km552mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | - |
| Length | 5,032mm198in | 4,743mm187in |
| Width | 1,899mm75in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,411mm56in | 1,613mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,945mm116in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,625mm64in | 1,622mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,649mm65in | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 400L | 402L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,420L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 202g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017S 560 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.0 s | 25.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 113 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017S 560 | 469 hp 350 kW |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has 18 hp more than Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) Facelift 2017 S 560.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) Facelift 2017 S 560 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017S 560 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017S 560 | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 2,273 kg 5,011 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017S 560 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017S 560 | 4.6 s |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh and Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) Facelift 2017 S 560: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017S 560 | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017S 560 | 469 hp 350 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017S 560 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017S 560 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 469 hp 350 kW | 487 hp 363 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb | 2,273 kg 5,011 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 889 km 552 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 202 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) Facelift 2017 S 560 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) Facelift 2017 S 560
- Is 213 kg lighter
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























