Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) · Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 V8vsFord Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang Mach-E
GT 98.7 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,945 kg4,288 lb
- Best power-to-weight245 hp/t182 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Most powerful487 hp363 kW
- Highest torque830 Nm612 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 V8 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 476hp355kW | 487hp363kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 830Nm612lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,945kg4,288lb | 2,273kg5,011lb |
| Gross weight | 2,590kg5,710lb | 2,717kg5,990lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.4s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 49.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.5s Calculated | 25.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.4L/100 km13.5mpg US16.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 245hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 334Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated | 365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 537km333mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | - |
| Length | 4,748mm187in | 4,743mm187in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,578mm62in | 1,613mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,873mm113in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,685mm66in | 1,622mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 159mm6in | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 402L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,400L | 1,420L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 280g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 V8 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.5 s | 25.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has 11 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 V8 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 V8 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 V8 | 1,945 kg 4,288 lb |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 2,273 kg 5,011 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 V8 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 V8 | 4.0 s |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 4.4 s |
Although Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 V8 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 V8 | 245 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 V8 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 476 hp 355 kW | 487 hp 363 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,945 kg 4,288 lb | 2,273 kg 5,011 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 537 km 333 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 280 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 245 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 63 V8
- Is 328 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 70 km/h (43 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 98 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 180 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























