Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) · Facelift 2020 AMG E 53vsFord Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang Mach-E
GT 98.7 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,895 kg4,178 lb
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t171 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best economy score83/100
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Most powerful487 hp363 kW
- Highest torque830 Nm612 lb-ft
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best practicality score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 435hp324kW | 487hp363kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 830Nm612lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 2,273kg5,011lb |
| Gross weight | 2,425kg5,346lb | 2,717kg5,990lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 49.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 25.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 230hp/t171kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 742km461mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,999cc183cu in | - |
| Length | - | 4,743mm187in |
| Width | - | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | - | 1,613mm64in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,622mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 402L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,420L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 204g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 25.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 435 hp 324 kW |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has 52 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 52 hp (39 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 2,273 kg 5,011 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 4.4 s |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 4.4 s |
Although Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 230 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 435 hp 324 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 435 hp 324 kW | 487 hp 363 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | 2,273 kg 5,011 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 742 km 461 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 204 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 230 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53
- Is 378 kg lighter
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Has 52 hp more
- Has 310 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























