XPENG G6
Performance 87.5 kWh
487 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2023-2025
Car comparison
XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWhvsFord Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E
GT 98.7 kWh
487 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2022-2025
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted202 km/h126 mph Restricted
- Most powerful487 hp363 kW
- Lightest2,095 kg4,619 lb
- Best power-to-weight232 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk571 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Highest torque860 Nm634 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 487hp363kW | 487hp363kW |
| Torque | 660Nm487lb-ft | 860Nm634lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,095kg4,619lb | 2,276kg5,018lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,717kg5,990lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 39.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 48.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.9s Calculated | 25.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 315Nm/t211lb-ft/ton Calculated | 378Nm/t253lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,753mm187in | 4,743mm187in |
| Width | 1,920mm76in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,650mm65in | 1,613mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,890mm114in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,613mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 571L | 402L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,374L | 1,420L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.9 s | 25.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 168 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 860 Nm 634 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 2,095 kg 4,619 lb |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 2,276 kg 5,018 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 3.9 s |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 487 hp 363 kW | 487 hp 363 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | 860 Nm 634 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,095 kg 4,619 lb | 2,276 kg 5,018 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 571 L 20.2 cu ft | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh
- Is 181 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 169 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Has 200 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWhvsFordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsFordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWhvsBMWM2 (G87)3.0
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsPolestar4102 kWh
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsAUDIe-tron SportbackS 95 kWh
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWhvsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWhvsMercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWhvsPorsche911 Dakar (992)3.0
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWhvsBMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsBMWM4 (G82)3.0
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWhvsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsLexusLC500 V8