Polestar 4
102 kWh
544 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2023-present
Car comparison
Polestar 4 102 kWhvsFord Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E
GT 98.7 kWh
487 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2022-2025
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Polestar 4 102 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful544 hp406 kW
- Best power-to-weight231 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Highest torque860 Nm634 lb-ft
- Lightest2,276 kg5,018 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | Polestar4102 kWh | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 544hp406kW | 487hp363kW |
| Torque | 686Nm506lb-ft | 860Nm634lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,351kg5,183lb | 2,276kg5,018lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,717kg5,990lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 41.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 48.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.5s Calculated | 25.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 231hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 378Nm/t253lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,839mm191in | 4,743mm187in |
| Width | 2,139mm84in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,544mm61in | 1,613mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,999mm118in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,613mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 166mm7in | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 402L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,536L | 1,420L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Polestar4102 kWh | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.5 s | 25.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 168 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
Polestar 4 102 kWh has 57 hp more than Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh and Polestar 4 102 kWh: 57 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 686 Nm 506 lb-ft |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 860 Nm 634 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 2,351 kg 5,183 lb |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 2,276 kg 5,018 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 3.8 s |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Polestar 4 102 kWh and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 231 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Polestar4102 kWh | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 544 hp 406 kW | 487 hp 363 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 686 Nm 506 lb-ft | 860 Nm 634 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,351 kg 5,183 lb | 2,276 kg 5,018 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 231 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Polestar 4 102 kWh
- Has 57 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 98 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Has 174 Nm more
- Is 75 kg lighter
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Polestar 4 102 kWh
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Polestar4102 kWhvsBMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsFordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
Polestar4102 kWhvsLexusLF-Z Electrified Concept90 kWh
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsAUDIe-tron SportbackS 95 kWh
Polestar4102 kWhvsFordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8
Polestar4102 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)AMG GLE 63 V8
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsBMWM2 (G87)3.0
Polestar4102 kWhvsLotusEletreX H550 2.0L
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsMercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53
Polestar4102 kWhvsBMW8 Series Gran Coupe (G16)M850i V8
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsPorsche911 Dakar (992)3.0