Car comparison

BMW M2 (G87) 3.0vsFord Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW M2 (G87)

3.0

480 hp2993 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2024-present
VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E

GT 98.7 kWh

487 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2022-2025

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M2 (G87) 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,705 kg
    3,759 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    282 hp/t
    210 kW/t
    3.6 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    81/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh

  • Most powerful
    487 hp
    363 kW
  • Highest torque
    860 Nm
    634 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    402 L
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best practicality score
    67/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWM2 (G87)3.0FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
480hp358kW
487hp363kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
860Nm634lb-ft
Curb weight
1,705kg3,759lb
2,276kg5,018lb
Gross weight
2,155kg4,751lb
2,717kg5,990lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
49.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
48.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
13.7s
25.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.2s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
282hp/t210kW/t128hp/1000 lb
Calculated
214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
323Nm/t216lb-ft/ton
Calculated
378Nm/t253lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
510km317mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
-
Length
4,580mm180in
4,743mm187in
Width
1,887mm74in
1,881mm74in
Height
1,403mm55in
1,613mm64in
Wheelbase
2,747mm108in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,617mm64in
1,613mm64in
Rear track
1,605mm63in
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance
123mm5in
130mm5in
Trunk volume
390L
402L
Max trunk volume-
1,420L
Doors
2
5
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
52L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWM2 (G87)3.0FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.7 s
25.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.3 s
10.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.2 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
190 km/h
118 mph
168 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 (G87)3.0
480 hp
358 kW
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
487 hp
363 kW

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has 7 hp more than BMW M2 (G87) 3.0.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 (G87)3.0
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
860 Nm
634 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 (G87)3.0
1,705 kg
3,759 lb
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
2,276 kg
5,018 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 (G87)3.0
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 (G87)3.04.2 s
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh4.4 s

Although Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has more power, BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 0.2 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 (G87)3.0
282 hp/t
210 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWM2 (G87)3.0
480 hp
358 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
487 hp
363 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWM2 (G87)3.0
Power
480 hp
358 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,580 mm
180.3 in
Height
1,403 mm
55.2 in
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
487 hp
363 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,743 mm
186.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWM2 (G87)3.0FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
480 hp
358 kW
487 hp
363 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
860 Nm
634 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,705 kg
3,759 lb
2,276 kg
5,018 lb
Fuel consumption
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,580 mm
180.3 in
Height
1,403 mm
55.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,743 mm
186.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in
Range score
510 km
317 mi
-
Trunk score
390 L
13.8 cu ft
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
282 hp/t
210 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M2 (G87) 3.0
Consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.73 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,678 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW M2 (G87) 3.0

  • Is 571 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 68 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 310 Nm more
  • Has 12 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0
CS 3.0
VS
BMWM2 (G87)3.0vsBMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
GT 98.7 kWh
Dark Horse 5.0 V8
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsFordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
3.0
3.0
VS
BMWM2 (G87)3.0vsBMWM4 (G82)3.0
GT 98.7 kWh
102 kWh
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsPolestar4102 kWh
3.0
M850i
VS
BMWM2 (G87)3.0vsBMW8 Series (G15)M850i
GT 98.7 kWh
S 95 kWh
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsAUDIe-tron SportbackS 95 kWh
3.0
M850i V8
VS
BMWM2 (G87)3.0vsBMW8 Series Gran Coupe (G16)M850i V8
GT 98.7 kWh
S 4.0 V8
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8
3.0
M50 83.9 kWh
VS
BMWM2 (G87)3.0vsBMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh
GT 98.7 kWh
3.0
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsBMWM2 (G87)3.0
3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM2 (G87)3.0vsBMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0
GT 98.7 kWh
AMG CLE 53
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsMercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster