BMW M2 (G87)
Car comparison
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0vsFord Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang Mach-E
GT 98.7 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,730 kg3,814 lb
- Best power-to-weight277 hp/t207 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score81/100
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Most powerful487 hp363 kW
- Highest torque860 Nm634 lb-ft
- Largest trunk402 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best practicality score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480hp358kW | 487hp363kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 860Nm634lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 2,276kg5,018lb |
| Gross weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,717kg5,990lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 46.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 48.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s | 25.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 277hp/t207kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 347Nm/t232lb-ft/ton Calculated | 378Nm/t253lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 531km330mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,580mm180in | 4,743mm187in |
| Width | 1,887mm74in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,403mm55in | 1,613mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,747mm108in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,613mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 123mm5in | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 402L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,420L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 25.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 120 mph | 168 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has 7 hp more than BMW M2 (G87) 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 860 Nm 634 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 2,276 kg 5,018 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 4.0 s |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 4.4 s |
Although Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has more power, BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 277 hp/t 207 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp 358 kW | 487 hp 363 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 860 Nm 634 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | 2,276 kg 5,018 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 531 km 330 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 277 hp/t 207 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0
- Is 546 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 63 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 260 Nm more
- Has 12 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























