Car comparison

BMW M4 (G82) 3.0vsFord Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW M4 (G82)

3.0

480 hp2993 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2020-2024
VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E

GT 98.7 kWh

487 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2022-2025

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M4 (G82) 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,700 kg
    3,748 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    282 hp/t
    211 kW/t
    3.5 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    440 L
  • Best performance score
    81/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWM4 (G82)3.0FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
480hp358kW
487hp363kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
860Nm634lb-ft
Curb weight
1,700kg3,748lb
2,276kg5,018lb
Gross weight
2,155kg4,751lb
2,717kg5,990lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
55.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
48.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
14.4s
Calculated
25.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
282hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb
Calculated
214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
324Nm/t216lb-ft/ton
Calculated
378Nm/t253lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
546km339mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
-
Length
4,794mm189in
4,743mm187in
Width
1,887mm74in
1,881mm74in
Height
1,393mm55in
1,613mm64in
Wheelbase
2,857mm112in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,617mm64in
1,613mm64in
Rear track
1,605mm63in
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance
120mm5in
130mm5in
Trunk volume
440L
402L
Max trunk volume-
1,420L
Doors
2
5
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
59L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWM4 (G82)3.0FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.4 s
25.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.3 s
10.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
187 km/h
116 mph
168 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (G82)3.0
480 hp
358 kW
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
487 hp
363 kW

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has 7 hp more than BMW M4 (G82) 3.0.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (G82)3.0
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
860 Nm
634 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (G82)3.0
1,700 kg
3,748 lb
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
2,276 kg
5,018 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (G82)3.0
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (G82)3.04.2 s
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh4.4 s

Although Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has more power, BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 0.2 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (G82)3.0
282 hp/t
211 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWM4 (G82)3.0
480 hp
358 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
487 hp
363 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWM4 (G82)3.0
Power
480 hp
358 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,794 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,393 mm
54.8 in
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
487 hp
363 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,743 mm
186.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWM4 (G82)3.0FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
480 hp
358 kW
487 hp
363 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
860 Nm
634 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,700 kg
3,748 lb
2,276 kg
5,018 lb
Fuel consumption
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,794 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,393 mm
54.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,743 mm
186.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in
Range score
546 km
339 mi
-
Trunk score
440 L
15.5 cu ft
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
282 hp/t
211 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M4 (G82) 3.0
Consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.42 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,835 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW M4 (G82) 3.0

  • Is 576 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 68 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 38 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster