BMW M4 (G82)
Car comparison
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0vsFord Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang Mach-E
GT 98.7 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,700 kg3,748 lb
- Best power-to-weight282 hp/t211 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score78/100
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Most powerful487 hp363 kW
- Highest torque860 Nm634 lb-ft
- Best overall score74/100
- Best practicality score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480hp358kW | 487hp363kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 860Nm634lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 2,276kg5,018lb |
| Gross weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,717kg5,990lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 48.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.4s Calculated | 25.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 282hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 324Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 378Nm/t253lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 546km339mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,794mm189in | 4,743mm187in |
| Width | 1,887mm74in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,393mm55in | 1,613mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,613mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 402L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,420L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.4 s | 25.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 168 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has 7 hp more than BMW M4 (G82) 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 860 Nm 634 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 2,276 kg 5,018 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 4.2 s |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 4.4 s |
Although Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has more power, BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp 358 kW | 487 hp 363 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 860 Nm 634 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 2,276 kg 5,018 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 546 km 339 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0
- Is 576 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 68 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 310 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























