BMW M2 coupe (F87)
Car comparison
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0vsBMW M4 (G82) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M4 (G82)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lightest1,550 kg3,417 lb
- Best power-to-weight290 hp/t216 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score79/100
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0
- Most powerful480 hp358 kW
- Best estimated range546 km339 mi
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 480hp358kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,155kg4,751lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 64.6s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 55.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.5s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 290hp/t216kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated | 282hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 355Nm/t237lb-ft/ton Calculated | 324Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 500km311mi Calculated | 546km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,461mm176in | 4,794mm189in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,887mm74in |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,393mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,693mm106in | 2,857mm112in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,601mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 118mm5in | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 440L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 59L |
| CO2 emissions | 238g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M4 (G82) 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,350-5,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,650-6,130 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.5 s | 14.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 119 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 has 30 hp more than BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) 3.0: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 4.2 s |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 4.2 s |
Although BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 has more power, BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 500 km 311 mi |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 546 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 480 hp 358 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 500 km 311 mi | 546 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 238 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 | BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 46 km (29 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























