Car comparison

Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 6.2 V8vsBMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018

6.2 V8

455 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2018-2023
VS

BMW M2 coupe (F87)

CS 3.0

450 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2020-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Lightest
    1,550 kg
    3,417 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    290 hp/t
    216 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.4 L/100 km
    22.6 mpg US
    27.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.9 L/100 km
    15.8 mpg US
    19.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    238 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    390 L
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    300 km/h
    186 mph Unrestricted
    290 km/h
    180 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    455 hp
    339 kW
  • Highest torque
    617 Nm
    455 lb-ft
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    649 km
    403 mi
  • Best performance score
    83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
Power
455hp339kW
450hp336kW
Torque
617Nm455lb-ft
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
1,659kg3,657lb
1,550kg3,417lb
Gross weight
2,120kg4,674lb
2,010kg4,431lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
69.8s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph
Calculated
64.6s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.4s
4.2s
0-200 km/h
13.7s
Calculated
13.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.2s
Calculated
4.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.4s
Calculated
12.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
274hp/t205kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
290hp/t216kW/t132hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton
Calculated
355Nm/t237lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
649km403mi
Calculated
500km311mi
Calculated
Displacement
6,162cc376cu in
2,979cc182cu in
Length
4,784mm188in
4,461mm176in
Width
1,897mm75in
1,871mm74in
Height
1,340mm53in
1,414mm56in
Wheelbase
2,811mm111in
2,693mm106in
Front track
1,610mm63in
1,579mm62in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,601mm63in
Ground clearance-
118mm5in
Trunk volume
258L
390L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
72L
52L
CO2 emissions
252g/km
238g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0PowerTorque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
  • BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V85,700 rpm4,600 rpm6,500 rpm
BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.06,250 rpm2,350-5,500 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.2 s
4.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.4 s
4.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.7 s
13.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
8.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
10.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.4 s
12.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
190 km/h
118 mph
191 km/h
119 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
455 hp
339 kW
BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
450 hp
336 kW

Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 has 5 hp more than BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
617 Nm
455 lb-ft
BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
550 Nm
406 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
1,659 kg
3,657 lb
BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
1,550 kg
3,417 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 has more power, BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
274 hp/t
205 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
290 hp/t
216 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
649 km
403 mi
BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
500 km
311 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
455 hp
339 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
450 hp
336 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
Power
455 hp
339 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,461 mm
175.6 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
Power
455 hp
339 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK

BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
4.4 s
BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
4.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
274 hp/t
205 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
290 hp/t
216 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
Power
455 hp
339 kW
450 hp
336 kW
Torque
617 Nm
455 lb-ft
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.4 s
4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Lightness
1,659 kg
3,657 lb
1,550 kg
3,417 lb
Fuel consumption
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,461 mm
175.6 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in
Range score
649 km
403 mi
500 km
311 mi
CO2 score
252 g/km
238 g/km
Trunk score
258 L
9.1 cu ft
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
274 hp/t
205 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
290 hp/t
216 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0
Consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.43 LC100 km18.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.26 LC100 mi29.29 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,914 LC/year2,730 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 67 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 149 km (92 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0

  • Is 109 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 132 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 vs BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster