BMW M2 coupe (F87)
Car comparison
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0vsJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Lightest1,550 kg3,417 lb
- Best power-to-weight290 hp/t216 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions238 g/km
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Best estimated range660 km410 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.6s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 63.2s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.5s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 290hp/t216kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated | 271hp/t202kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 355Nm/t237lb-ft/ton Calculated | 349Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 500km311mi Calculated | 660km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,461mm176in | 4,470mm176in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,311mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,693mm106in | 2,622mm103in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,601mm63in | 1,628mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 118mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 299L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 509L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 238g/km | 244g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,350-5,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.5 s | 14.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 119 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 4.2 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 500 km 311 mi |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 660 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.6 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 500 km 311 mi | 660 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 238 g/km | 244 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 299 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 | Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 91 L more trunk volume
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 160 km (100 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























