Ford Mustang Mach-E
Car comparison
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWhvsXPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonXPENG G6
Performance 87.5 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful487 hp363 kW
- Highest torque950 Nm701 lb-ft
- Best performance score80/100
- Best economy score0/100
XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh
- Lightest2,095 kg4,619 lb
- Best power-to-weight232 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk571 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 487hp363kW | 487hp363kW |
| Torque | 950Nm701lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,276kg5,018lb | 2,095kg4,619lb |
| Gross weight | 2,719kg5,994lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 41.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 39.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.7s Calculated | 20.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 417Nm/t279lb-ft/ton Calculated | 315Nm/t211lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,743mm187in | 4,753mm187in |
| Width | 1,881mm74in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,613mm64in | 1,650mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,890mm114in |
| Front track | 1,622mm64in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,630mm64in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 402L | 571L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,420L | 1,374L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.7 s | 20.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft |
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 2,276 kg 5,018 lb |
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 2,095 kg 4,619 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 3.8 s |
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh and XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 487 hp 363 kW | 487 hp 363 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,276 kg 5,018 lb | 2,095 kg 4,619 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | 571 L 20.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Has 290 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh
- Is 181 kg lighter
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 169 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























