Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53vsFord Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang Mach-E
GT 98.7 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,005 kg4,420 lb
- Best power-to-weight224 hp/t167 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk545 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Most powerful487 hp363 kW
- Highest torque950 Nm701 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 449hp335kW | 487hp363kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft | 950Nm701lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,005kg4,420lb | 2,276kg5,018lb |
| Gross weight | 2,640kg5,820lb | 2,719kg5,994lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.4s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 42.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.8s Calculated | 21.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 224hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 319Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated | 417Nm/t279lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 639km397mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,999cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,792mm189in | 4,743mm187in |
| Width | 1,920mm76in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,603mm63in | 1,613mm64in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,622mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 545L | 402L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,420L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.8 s | 21.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 449 hp 335 kW |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has 38 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 38 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 2,005 kg 4,420 lb |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 2,276 kg 5,018 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 4.2 s |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 3.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 449 hp 335 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 449 hp 335 kW | 487 hp 363 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,005 kg 4,420 lb | 2,276 kg 5,018 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 639 km 397 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 545 L 19.2 cu ft | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53
- Is 271 kg lighter
- Has 65 km/h (40 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 143 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 310 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























