Car comparison

BMW M2 (G87) 3.0vsFord Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW M2 (G87)

3.0

480 hp2993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2026-present
VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E

GT 98.7 kWh

487 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2025-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M2 (G87) 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,790 kg
    3,946 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    268 hp/t
    200 kW/t
    3.7 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    83/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh

  • Most powerful
    487 hp
    363 kW
  • Highest torque
    950 Nm
    701 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    402 L
  • Best overall score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    67/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWM2 (G87)3.0FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
480hp358kW
487hp363kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
950Nm701lb-ft
Curb weight
1,790kg3,946lb
2,276kg5,018lb
Gross weight
2,205kg4,861lb
2,719kg5,994lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
49.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
41.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.7s
3.8s
0-200 km/h
12.8s
21.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.5s
Calculated
3.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.7s
Calculated
12.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
268hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb
Calculated
214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
335Nm/t224lb-ft/ton
Calculated
417Nm/t279lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
500km311mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
-
Length
4,580mm180in
4,743mm187in
Width
1,887mm74in
1,881mm74in
Height
1,404mm55in
1,613mm64in
Wheelbase
2,747mm108in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,617mm64in
1,622mm64in
Rear track
1,605mm63in
1,630mm64in
Ground clearance
123mm5in
127mm5in
Trunk volume
390L
402L
Max trunk volume-
1,420L
Doors
2
5
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
52L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWM2 (G87)3.0FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.5 s
3.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.7 s
3.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.8 s
21.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
5.0 s
5.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
7.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.9 s
10.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.7 s
12.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
193 km/h
120 mph
174 km/h
108 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 (G87)3.0
480 hp
358 kW
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
487 hp
363 kW

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has 7 hp more than BMW M2 (G87) 3.0.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 (G87)3.0
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
950 Nm
701 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 (G87)3.0
1,790 kg
3,946 lb
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
2,276 kg
5,018 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 (G87)3.0
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 (G87)3.03.7 s
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh3.8 s

Although Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has more power, BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 0.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 (G87)3.0
268 hp/t
200 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWM2 (G87)3.0
480 hp
358 kW
3.7 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
487 hp
363 kW
3.8 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWM2 (G87)3.0
Power
480 hp
358 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,580 mm
180.3 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
487 hp
363 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,743 mm
186.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWM2 (G87)3.0FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
480 hp
358 kW
487 hp
363 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
950 Nm
701 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.7 s
3.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,790 kg
3,946 lb
2,276 kg
5,018 lb
Fuel consumption
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,580 mm
180.3 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,743 mm
186.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in
Range score
500 km
311 mi
-
Trunk score
390 L
13.8 cu ft
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
268 hp/t
200 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M2 (G87) 3.0
Consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi29.29 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,730 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW M2 (G87) 3.0

  • Is 486 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 54 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 350 Nm more
  • Has 12 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster