Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8vsFord Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)

55 V8

476 hp3982 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2023-present
VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E

GT 98.7 kWh

487 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2022-2025

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    295 km/h
    183 mph
  • Lightest
    1,895 kg
    4,178 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    251 hp/t
    187 kW/t
    4.0 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    76/100
  • Best performance score
    87/100
  • Best economy score
    69/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
476hp355kW
487hp363kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
860Nm634lb-ft
Curb weight
1,895kg4,178lb
2,276kg5,018lb
Gross weight-
2,717kg5,990lb
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
61.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph
Calculated
48.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.9s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
12.3s
Calculated
25.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.7s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.8s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
251hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb
Calculated
214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton
Calculated
378Nm/t253lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
496km308mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
-
Length
4,728mm186in
4,743mm187in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,881mm74in
Height
1,354mm53in
1,613mm64in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,683mm66in
1,613mm64in
Rear track
1,686mm66in
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance-
130mm5in
Trunk volume
321L
402L
Max trunk volume
675L
1,420L
Doors
3
5
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
70L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.7 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.9 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.3 s
25.3 s
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.8 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.0 s
10.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.8 s
12.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
196 km/h
122 mph
168 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
476 hp
355 kW
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
487 hp
363 kW

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has 11 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
860 Nm
634 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
1,895 kg
4,178 lb
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
2,276 kg
5,018 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
295 km/h
183 mph
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V83.9 s
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh4.4 s

Although Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has more power, Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
476 hp
355 kW
3.9 s
295 km/h
183 mph
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
487 hp
363 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
Power
476 hp
355 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,354 mm
53.3 in
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
487 hp
363 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,743 mm
186.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
476 hp
355 kW
487 hp
363 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
860 Nm
634 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.9 s
4.4 s
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,895 kg
4,178 lb
2,276 kg
5,018 lb
Fuel consumption
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,354 mm
53.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,743 mm
186.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in
Range score
496 km
308 mi
-
Trunk score
321 L
11.3 cu ft
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8
Consumption14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.68 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi39.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,701 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8

  • Is 381 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 80 km/h (50 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Has 160 Nm more
  • Has 81 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

55 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8
GT 98.7 kWh
Dark Horse 5.0 V8
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsFordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
55 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
GT 98.7 kWh
102 kWh
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsPolestar4102 kWh
55 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8
GT 98.7 kWh
S 95 kWh
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsAUDIe-tron SportbackS 95 kWh
55 V8
AMG GLC 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 V8
GT 98.7 kWh
S 4.0 V8
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023S 4.0 V8
55 V8
AMG CLE 53
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53
GT 98.7 kWh
3.0
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsBMWM2 (G87)3.0
55 V8
AMG C 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8
55 V8
AMG GLC 43
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster