Car comparison

Volkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2010 2.0 TDIvsFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2010

2.0 TDI

177 hp1968 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2013-2015
VS

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 TDCi

210 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    123 hp/t
    92 kW/t
    8.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    144 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,273 km
    791 mi
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    214 km/h
    133 mph
  • Lightest
    1,598 kg
    3,523 lb
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    695 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best practicality score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDIFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
177hp132kW
210hp157kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,598kg3,523lb
1,704kg3,757lb
Gross weight
2,220kg4,894lb
2,620kg5,776lb
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
To 99% top speed
90.8s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
101.2s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.2s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
48.2s
Calculated
53.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton
Calculated
264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,053km654mi
Calculated
1,273km791mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,397mm173in
4,848mm191in
Width
1,794mm71in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,674mm66in
1,747mm69in
Wheelbase
2,678mm105in
2,849mm112in
Front track
1,541mm61in
1,606mm63in
Rear track
1,514mm60in
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance-
124mm5in
Trunk volume
695L
300L
Max trunk volume
1,989L
2,339L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
70L
CO2 emissions
150g/km
144g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDIFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCiPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI4,200 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,450 rpm
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi3,750 rpm2,000-2,250 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDIFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.2 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
48.2 s
53.4 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
177 hp
132 kW
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has 33 hp more than Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 33 hp (25 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
1,598 kg
3,523 lb
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1,704 kg
3,757 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
214 km/h
133 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
214 km/h
133 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI8.2 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi8.9 s

Although Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has more power, Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
1,053 km
654 mi
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1,273 km
791 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
177 hp
132 kW
8.2 s
214 km/h
133 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW
8.9 s
214 km/h
133 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
695 L
24.5 cu ft
Length
4,397 mm
173.1 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
8.2 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDIFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
177 hp
132 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.2 s
8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Lightness
1,598 kg
3,523 lb
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
Fuel consumption
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
695 L
24.5 cu ft
Length
4,397 mm
173.1 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Range score
1,053 km
654 mi
1,273 km
791 mi
CO2 score
150 g/km
144 g/km
Trunk score
695 L
24.5 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDIFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
Consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.98 LC100 km9.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.05 LC100 mi15.49 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used855 L226 US gal188 UK gal825 L218 US gal181 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,496 LC/year1,444 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI

  • Is 106 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 395 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

  • Has 33 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 220 km (137 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 6 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Touran I 2.0 TDI
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI
1.8 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDIvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDIvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
2.0 TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TDCi
220d
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
2.0 TDI
220d
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDIvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
2.0 TDCi
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
Volkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI vs Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster