Car comparison

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCivsVolkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2010 1.4 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 TDCi

210 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

Volkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2010

1.4 TSI

170 hp1390 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbo + superchargedMinivan / MPV2010-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

  • Fastest top speed
    214 km/h
    133 mph
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    123 hp/t
    92 kW/t
    8.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    144 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,273 km
    791 mi
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCiVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
Power
210hp157kW
170hp127kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,704kg3,757lb
1,492kg3,289lb
Gross weight
2,620kg5,776lb
2,160kg4,762lb
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
213 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
101.2s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
92.0s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.9s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
53.4s
Calculated
50.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.4s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton
Calculated
161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,273km791mi
Calculated
909km565mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,390cc85cu in
Length
4,848mm191in
4,397mm173in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,794mm71in
Height
1,747mm69in
1,674mm66in
Wheelbase
2,849mm112in
2,678mm105in
Front track
1,606mm63in
1,541mm61in
Rear track
1,606mm63in
1,514mm60in
Ground clearance
124mm5in
140mm6in
Trunk volume
300L
695L
Max trunk volume
2,339L
1,989L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
60L
CO2 emissions
144g/km
154g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCiVolkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 1.4 TSIPowerTorque
  • Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi3,750 rpm2,000-2,250 rpm4,000 rpm
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI6,000 rpm1,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCiVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.4 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.9 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
53.4 s
50.6 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
213 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
138 km/h
86 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
170 hp
127 kW

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has 40 hp more than Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 1.4 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 1.4 TSI and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 40 hp (30 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
1,492 kg
3,289 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
214 km/h
133 mph
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
213 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi8.9 s
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI8.5 s

Although Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has more power, Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 1.4 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 1.4 TSI and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 1.4 TSI: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1,273 km
791 mi
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
909 km
565 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW
8.9 s
214 km/h
133 mph
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
170 hp
127 kW
8.5 s
213 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
213 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
695 L
24.5 cu ft
Length
4,397 mm
173.1 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
213 km/h
132 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.9 s
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCiVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.9 s
8.5 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
213 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
1,492 kg
3,289 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
695 L
24.5 cu ft
Length
4,397 mm
173.1 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
Range score
1,273 km
791 mi
909 km
565 mi
CO2 score
144 g/km
154 g/km
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
695 L
24.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCiVolkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 1.4 TSI
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km11.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi18.59 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal990 L262 US gal218 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year1,733 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

  • Has 40 hp more
  • Has 210 Nm more
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 364 km (226 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 10 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 1.4 TSI

  • Is 212 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 395 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
Volkswagen Touran I 1.4 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
1.4 TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1.4 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
1.4 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSIvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
2.0 TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
1.4 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSIvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TDCi
220d
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
1.4 TSI
218d
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSIvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
2.0 TDCi
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi vs Volkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2010 1.4 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster