Ford S-MAX II
Car comparison
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCivsFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Galaxy III
2.0 TDCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
- Best estimated range1,273 km791 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score92/100
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
- Lightest1,704 kg3,757 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,766kg3,893lb | 1,704kg3,757lb |
| Gross weight | 2,575kg5,677lb | 2,620kg5,776lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 100.5s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 48.1s Calculated | 53.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 255Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,273km791mi Calculated | 1,273km791mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,796mm189in | 4,848mm191in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,655mm65in | 1,747mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,849mm112in | 2,849mm112in |
| Front track | 1,606mm63in | 1,606mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 150mm6in | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 285L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,020L | 2,339L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
- Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 3,750 rpm | 2,000-2,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 3,750 rpm | 2,000-2,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 48.1 s | 53.1 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 8.8 s |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 1,273 km 791 mi |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 1,273 km 791 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.8 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.9 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,273 km 791 mi | 1,273 km 791 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi | Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
- Is 62 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























