Car comparison

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostvsFord S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

Ford S-MAX II

2.0 TDCi

210 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Lightest
    1,658 kg
    3,655 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    145 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi

  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    144 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,273 km
    791 mi
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
Power
240hp179kW
210hp157kW
Torque
345Nm254lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,658kg3,655lb
1,766kg3,893lb
Gross weight
2,585kg5,699lb
2,575kg5,677lb
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
98.7s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
101.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
43.3s
Calculated
48.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
255Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
886km551mi
Calculated
1,273km791mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,848mm191in
4,796mm189in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,747mm69in
1,655mm65in
Wheelbase
2,849mm112in
2,849mm112in
Front track
1,606mm63in
1,606mm63in
Rear track
1,606mm63in
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance
124mm5in
150mm6in
Trunk volume
300L
285L
Max trunk volume
2,339L
2,020L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions
180g/km
144g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostFord S-MAX II 2.0 TDCiPowerTorque
  • Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost5,400 rpm2,300-4,900 rpm5,650 rpm
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi3,750 rpm2,000-2,250 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
43.3 s
48.1 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost has 30 hp more than Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi.

The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
1,766 kg
3,893 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
222 km/h
138 mph
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost8.6 s
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 2.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
886 km
551 mi
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
1,273 km
791 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
222 km/h
138 mph
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW
8.8 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.6 s
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
Power
240 hp
179 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.8 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
1,766 kg
3,893 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Range score
886 km
551 mi
1,273 km
791 mi
CO2 score
180 g/km
144 g/km
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostFord S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km9.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi15.49 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal825 L218 US gal181 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year1,444 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Is 108 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 15 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi

  • Has 105 Nm more
  • Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 387 km (240 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 36 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TDCi
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCivsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
225i
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i
2.0 TDCi
220d
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCivsVolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost vs Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster