BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45)
Car comparison
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220dvsFord S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord S-MAX II
2.0 TDCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions127 g/km
- Largest trunk468 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,273 km791 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,766kg3,893lb |
| Gross weight | 2,045kg4,508lb | 2,575kg5,677lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.8s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 101.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.7s Calculated | 48.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 255Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,063km660mi Calculated | 1,273km791mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,342mm171in | 4,796mm189in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,555mm61in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,849mm112in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,606mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | 150mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 468L | 285L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | 2,020L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 127g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d: Power / Torque
- Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 3,750 rpm | 2,000-2,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.7 s | 48.1 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW |
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi has 20 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 7.3 s |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 8.8 s |
Although Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi has more power, BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 1,063 km 660 mi |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 1,273 km 791 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.8 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,063 km 660 mi | 1,273 km 791 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 127 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 468 L 16.5 cu ft | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d | Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d
- Is 256 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 183 L more trunk volume
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 210 km (131 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























