Ford Explorer VI
Car comparison
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 3.0 P340
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023
3.0 P340
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful349 hp260 kW
- Highest torque555 Nm409 lb-ft
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score99/100
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 P340
- Lightest2,010 kg4,431 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk748 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 349hp260kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 555Nm409lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,391kg5,271lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Gross weight | 3,160kg6,967lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 78.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.7s Calculated | 26.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 2.9L/100 km81.1mpg US97.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 2,476km1,538mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,956cc180cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,049mm199in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 2,004mm79in | 2,041mm80in |
| Height | 1,778mm70in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 3,025mm119in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | - | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 748L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,274L | 1,811L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 83L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 P340: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 5,750 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.7 s | 26.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 349 hp 260 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 has 9 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 P340.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 P340 and Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 555 Nm 409 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 2,391 kg 5,271 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | 2,010 kg 4,431 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 6.0 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 P340: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 349 hp 260 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.3 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 349 hp 260 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 555 Nm 409 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,391 kg 5,271 lb | 2,010 kg 4,431 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 2,476 km 1,538 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 2.9 L/100 km81.1 mpg US97.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 5.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 8.17 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 435 L115 US gal96 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 761.25 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 75 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 P340
- Is 381 kg lighter
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 418 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























