Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) · Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 TFSIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 3.0 P340
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023
3.0 P340
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Largest trunk810 L
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 P340
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lightest2,010 kg4,431 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score64/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TFSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Gross weight | 2,810kg6,195lb | - |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 81.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 81.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.6s Calculated | 24.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 694km432mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,878mm192in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | - |
| Height | 1,712mm67in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,904mm114in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,671mm66in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,688mm66in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 810L | 748L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,800L | 1,811L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 83L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 P340: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TFSI | - | 1,340-5,300 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TFSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.6 s | 24.0 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TFSI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TFSI | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | 2,010 kg 4,431 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TFSI | 6.1 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 TFSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 P340: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TFSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.1 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TFSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P340 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb | 2,010 kg 4,431 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 694 km 432 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 810 L 28.6 cu ft | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 TFSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 TFSI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 62 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 P340
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























