Ford Explorer VI
Car comparison
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6vsMercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296)
EQS 450 120 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,391 kg5,271 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Best economy score99/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 349hp260kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 555Nm409lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,391kg5,271lb | 2,730kg6,019lb |
| Gross weight | 3,160kg6,967lb | 3,375kg7,441lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 71.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.8s Calculated | 32.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 2.9L/100 km81.1mpg US97.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 2,476km1,538mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,956cc180cu in | - |
| Length | 5,049mm199in | 5,125mm202in |
| Width | 2,004mm79in | 1,959mm77in |
| Height | 1,778mm70in | 1,718mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 3,025mm119in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | - | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,681mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 178mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,274L | 2,100L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.8 s | 32.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 349 hp 260 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 360 hp 268 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh has 11 hp more than Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 and Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 555 Nm 409 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 2,391 kg 5,271 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 6.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 6.0 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh has more power, Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 349 hp 260 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | 360 hp 268 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 349 hp 260 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 555 Nm 409 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,391 kg 5,271 lb | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 2,476 km 1,538 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 2.9 L/100 km81.1 mpg US97.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 5.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 8.17 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 435 L115 US gal96 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 761.25 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
- Is 339 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 245 Nm more
- Has 235 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























