Car comparison

Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCivsToyota Alphard III · Facelift 2018 3.5 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TDCi

170 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2019
VS

Toyota Alphard III · Facelift 2018

3.5 V6

300 hp3456 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedMinivan / MPV2018-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Fastest top speed
    212 km/h
    132 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,444 kg
    3,183 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,250 km
    777 mi
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.3 s
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    141 hp/t
    105 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    96/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCiToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power
170hp127kW
300hp224kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
361Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight
1,444kg3,183lb
2,125kg4,685lb
Gross weight
2,050kg4,519lb
2,675kg5,897lb
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
87.8s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
94.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
50.3s
Calculated
56.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,250km777mi
Calculated
619km385mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
3,456cc211cu in
Length
4,379mm172in
4,945mm195in
Width
1,828mm72in
1,850mm73in
Height
1,610mm63in
1,945mm77in
Wheelbase
2,648mm104in
3,000mm118in
Front track
1,557mm61in
-
Rear track
1,569mm62in
-
Ground clearance-
160mm6in
Trunk volume
432L
-
Max trunk volume
1,684L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
60L
65L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCiToyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6PowerTorque
  • Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
  • Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi3,500 rpm2,000-2,500 rpm3,750 rpm
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V66,600 rpm4,600-4,700 rpm6,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCiToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
50.3 s
56.6 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
88 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
300 hp
224 kW

Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 has 130 hp more than Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi.

The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: 130 hp (97 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
361 Nm
266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,444 kg
3,183 lb
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
2,125 kg
4,685 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
212 km/h
132 mph
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi8.5 s
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V68.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 and Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: 5.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,250 km
777 mi
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
619 km
385 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW
8.5 s
212 km/h
132 mph
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
300 hp
224 kW
8.3 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,945 mm
194.7 in
Height
1,945 mm
76.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.5 s
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCiToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power
170 hp
127 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
361 Nm
266 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.3 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,444 kg
3,183 lb
2,125 kg
4,685 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,945 mm
194.7 in
Height
1,945 mm
76.6 in
Range score
1,250 km
777 mi
619 km
385 mi
Trunk score
432 L
15.3 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCiToyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km18.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi29.57 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year2,756 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Has 39 Nm more
  • Is 681 kg lighter
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 5.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 631 km (392 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6

  • Has 130 hp more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford C-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Toyota Alphard III 3.5 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
3.5 V6
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6vsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
3.5 V6
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
VS
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6vsFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 TDCi
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
3.5 V6
223i
VS
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6vsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
2.0 TDCi
1.8 TSI
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsVolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
2.0 TDCi
218d
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)218d
3.5 V6
225i
VS
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6vsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
3.5 V6
2.0 TSI
VS
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6vsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi vs Toyota Alphard III · Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster