Car comparison

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFord C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
VS

Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TDCi

170 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue

  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    101 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    700 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    95/100

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Lightest
    1,444 kg
    3,183 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,250 km
    777 mi
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoblueFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
240hp179kW
170hp127kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,766kg3,893lb
1,444kg3,183lb
Gross weight
2,575kg5,677lb
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
96.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
88.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
46.2s
Calculated
50.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton
Calculated
277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,111km690mi
Calculated
1,250km777mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,796mm189in
4,379mm172in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,828mm72in
Height
1,655mm65in
1,610mm63in
Wheelbase
2,849mm112in
2,648mm104in
Front track
1,606mm63in
1,557mm61in
Rear track
1,606mm63in
1,569mm62in
Ground clearance
150mm6in
-
Trunk volume
700L
432L
Max trunk volume
2,200L
1,684L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
60L
CO2 emissions
162g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoblueFord C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCiPowerTorque
  • Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: Power / Torque
  • Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue4,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi3,500 rpm2,000-2,500 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoblueFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
46.2 s
50.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
88 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
240 hp
179 kW
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue has 70 hp more than Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi.

The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: 70 hp (52 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
1,766 kg
3,893 lb
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,444 kg
3,183 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
218 km/h
135 mph
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue8.6 s
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi8.5 s

Although Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue has more power, Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
1,111 km
690 mi
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,250 km
777 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
218 km/h
135 mph
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW
8.5 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.6 s
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoblueFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
240 hp
179 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,766 kg
3,893 lb
1,444 kg
3,183 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in
Range score
1,111 km
690 mi
1,250 km
777 mi
CO2 score
162 g/km
-
Trunk score
700 L
24.7 cu ft
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoblueFord C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue

  • Has 70 hp more
  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 268 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Is 322 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 139 km (86 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Ford C-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
1.8 TSI
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsVolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
2.0 TDCi
218d
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)218d
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
225i
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
223i
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue vs Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster