Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TSIvsFord S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord S-MAX II
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,111 km690 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Lightest1,715 kg3,781 lb
- Largest trunk955 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score96/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,715kg3,781lb | 1,766kg3,893lb |
| Gross weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,575kg5,677lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.0s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 96.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.3s Calculated | 46.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 959km596mi Calculated | 1,111km690mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,854mm191in | 4,796mm189in |
| Width | 1,904mm75in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,746mm69in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,920mm115in | 2,849mm112in |
| Front track | 1,571mm62in | 1,606mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,617mm64in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | 150mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 955L | 700L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,430L | 2,200L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.3 s | 46.2 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 240 hp 179 kW |
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 8.6 s |
Although Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue has more power, Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue and Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 959 km 596 mi |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 1,111 km 690 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.8 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 240 hp 179 kW | 8.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 959 km 596 mi | 1,111 km 690 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 955 L 33.7 cu ft | 700 L 24.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI | Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI
- Is 51 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 255 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 152 km (95 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























