Car comparison

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223ivsFord S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06)

223i

204 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2021-present
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue

  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    101 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,111 km
    690 mi
  • Largest trunk
    700 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223iFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Power
204hp152kW
240hp179kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,545kg3,406lb
1,766kg3,893lb
Gross weight
2,105kg4,641lb
2,575kg5,677lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
84.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
95.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
27.9s
Calculated
46.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
682km424mi
Calculated
1,111km690mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,386mm173in
4,796mm189in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,576mm62in
1,655mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,849mm112in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,606mm63in
Rear track
1,587mm62in
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance
171mm7in
150mm6in
Trunk volume
415L
700L
Max trunk volume
1,405L
2,200L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
45L
70L
CO2 emissions-
162g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223iFord S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluePowerTorque
  • BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i: Power / Torque
  • Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i5,000-6,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm6,750 rpm
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue4,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223iFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.9 s
46.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
97 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
204 hp
152 kW
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
240 hp
179 kW

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue has 36 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: 36 hp (27 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
1,766 kg
3,893 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
241 km/h
150 mph
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i7.0 s
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue8.6 s

Although Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue has more power, BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
682 km
424 mi
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
1,111 km
690 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
204 hp
152 kW
7.0 s
241 km/h
150 mph
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
415 L
14.7 cu ft
Length
4,386 mm
172.7 in
Height
1,576 mm
62.0 in
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
7.0 s
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223iFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Power
204 hp
152 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
8.6 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
1,766 kg
3,893 lb
Fuel consumption
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
415 L
14.7 cu ft
Length
4,386 mm
172.7 in
Height
1,576 mm
62.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Range score
682 km
424 mi
1,111 km
690 mi
CO2 score
-
162 g/km
Trunk score
415 L
14.7 cu ft
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223iFord S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.55 LC100 km11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.59 LC100 mi17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used990 L262 US gal218 UK gal945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,733 LC/year1,654 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i

  • Is 221 kg lighter
  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue

  • Has 36 hp more
  • Has 180 Nm more
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 429 km (267 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 285 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

223i
220i
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223ivsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
223i
220i
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223ivsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220i
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
223i
220d
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223ivsBMW2 Series Coupe (G42)220d
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
223i
220d
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223ivsBMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F44)220d
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
223i
220
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223ivsBMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
223i
220i
VS
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223ivsBMW2 Series Coupe (F22)220i
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i vs Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue - car comparison - FastVsFaster