Volkswagen Touran II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDIvsFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord C-MAX II
1.6 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions125 g/km
- Best estimated range1,208 km751 mi
- Largest trunk834 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score95/100
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
- Lightest1,310 kg2,888 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI | FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 182hp136kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,310kg2,888lb |
| Gross weight | 2,240kg4,938lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 88.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 42.2s Calculated | 44.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,208km751mi Calculated | 887km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,596cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,527mm178in | 4,380mm172in |
| Width | 1,829mm72in | 1,828mm72in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,626mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,648mm104in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,569mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 156mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 834L | 432L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,980L | 1,723L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 125g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 5,700 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI | FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 42.2 s | 44.5 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW |
Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI has 8 hp more than Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI | 8.2 s |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI | 1,208 km 751 mi |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 887 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW | 8.5 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI | FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 182 hp 136 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,208 km 751 mi | 887 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 125 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 834 L 29.5 cu ft | 432 L 15.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI | Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 160 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 321 km (200 mi) more estimated range
- Has 402 L more trunk volume
- Emits 19 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
- Is 230 kg lighter
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























