Tesla Model Y
Performance 80.5 kWh
534 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2021-2025
Car comparison
Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWhvsFisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Fisker Ocean
Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
564 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2022-2024
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,995 kg4,398 lb
- Best power-to-weight268 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk854 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
- Most powerful564 hp421 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 534hp398kW | 564hp421kW |
| Torque | - | 737Nm544lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 2,436kg5,370lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,974kg6,557lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 35.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 35.6s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.2s Calculated | 26.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 268hp/t200kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 303Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,775mm188in |
| Width | 1,921mm76in | 1,990mm78in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,629mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,890mm114in | 2,921mm115in |
| Front track | 1,646mm65in | 1,696mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,630mm64in | 1,732mm68in |
| Ground clearance | 167mm7in | 180mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 854L | 476L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,158L | 918L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.2 s | 26.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 126 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 534 hp 398 kW |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 564 hp 421 kW |
Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range has 30 hp more than Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh and Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range: 30 hp (22 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 2,436 kg 5,370 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 206 km/h 128 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 3.7 s |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 4.2 s |
Although Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range has more power, Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh and Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 534 hp 398 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 564 hp 421 kW | 4.2 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 534 hp 398 kW | 564 hp 421 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 737 Nm 544 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | 2,436 kg 5,370 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 854 L 30.2 cu ft | 476 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh
- Is 441 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 54 km/h (34 mph) higher top speed
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 378 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
- Has 30 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh
Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWhvsTeslaModel Y JuniperFacelift 2025Performance 84.7 kWh
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper RangevsMercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh
TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWhvsTeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper RangevsMaseratiGrecaleFolgore 105 kWh
TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWhvsTeslaModel XFacelift 2021Long Range 100 kWh
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper RangevsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWhvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper RangevsTeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWh
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper RangevsPolestar3111 kWh
TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWhvsAUDIRSQ8 (4M)Facelift 20244.0 TFSI V8
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper RangevsAUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper RangevsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Folgore 105 kWh