Tesla Model Y
Long Range 80.5 kWh
514 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2021-2025
Car comparison
Tesla Model Y Long Range 80.5 kWhvsFisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Fisker Ocean
Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
564 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2022-2024
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model Y Long Range 80.5 kWh
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted217 km/h135 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,979 kg4,363 lb
- Best power-to-weight260 hp/t194 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk854 L
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Most powerful564 hp421 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWh | FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 514hp383kW | 564hp421kW |
| Torque | - | 737Nm544lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,979kg4,363lb | 2,436kg5,370lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,974kg6,557lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 217 km/h135 mph Calculated | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 39.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 35.6s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.9s Calculated | 26.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 303Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,775mm188in |
| Width | 1,921mm76in | 1,990mm78in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,629mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,890mm114in | 2,921mm115in |
| Front track | 1,636mm64in | 1,696mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,636mm64in | 1,732mm68in |
| Ground clearance | 167mm7in | 180mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 854L | 476L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,158L | 918L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWh | FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.9 s | 26.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 217 km/h135 mph Likely limited | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 110 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWh | 514 hp 383 kW |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 564 hp 421 kW |
Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range has 50 hp more than Tesla Model Y Long Range 80.5 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model Y Long Range 80.5 kWh and Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range: 50 hp (37 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWh | 1,979 kg 4,363 lb |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 2,436 kg 5,370 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWh | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 217 km/h135 mph |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 206 km/h 128 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWh | 5.0 s |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range and Tesla Model Y Long Range 80.5 kWh: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWh | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWh | 514 hp 383 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 217 km/h135 mph |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 564 hp 421 kW | 4.2 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWh | FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 514 hp 383 kW | 564 hp 421 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 737 Nm 544 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 217 km/h135 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,979 kg 4,363 lb | 2,436 kg 5,370 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 854 L 30.2 cu ft | 476 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model Y Long Range 80.5 kWh
- Is 457 kg lighter
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 378 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
- Has 50 hp more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Tesla Model Y Long Range 80.5 kWh
Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWhvsTeslaModel Y JuniperFacelift 2025Long Range 79 kWh
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper RangevsMercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh
TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWhvsTeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper RangevsMaseratiGrecaleFolgore 105 kWh
TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWhvsPolestar3111 kWh
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper RangevsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWhvsAUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh
TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWhvsTeslaModel XFacelift 2021Long Range 100 kWh
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper RangevsTeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh
TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWhvsAUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper RangevsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Folgore 105 kWh
TeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWhvsAUDISQ8 e-tron Sportback114 kWh