Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWhvsFisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFisker Ocean
Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Highest torque858 Nm633 lb-ft
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Most powerful564 hp421 kW
- Lightest2,436 kg5,370 lb
- Best power-to-weight232 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 544hp406kW | 564hp421kW |
| Torque | 858Nm633lb-ft | 737Nm544lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,770kg6,107lb | 2,436kg5,370lb |
| Gross weight | 3,410kg7,518lb | 2,974kg6,557lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 49.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 35.8s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.1s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 310Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 303Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 5,125mm202in | 4,775mm188in |
| Width | 1,959mm77in | - |
| Height | 1,718mm68in | 1,629mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 3,210mm126in | 2,921mm115in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,696mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,681mm66in | 1,732mm68in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | 180mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 476L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,100L | 918L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.1 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 564 hp 421 kW |
Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range has 20 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh and Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 737 Nm 544 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | 2,770 kg 6,107 lb |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 2,436 kg 5,370 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 206 km/h 128 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | 4.7 s |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range and Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 564 hp 421 kW | 4.2 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh | FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 544 hp 406 kW | 564 hp 421 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft | 737 Nm 544 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,770 kg 6,107 lb | 2,436 kg 5,370 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 476 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh
- Has 121 Nm more
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 89 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 334 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























