Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWhvsFisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296)

EQS 580 125 kWh

544 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2023-present
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    858 Nm
    633 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    565 L
  • Best overall score
    80/100
  • Best economy score
    0/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWhFiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range
Power
544hp406kW
564hp421kW
Torque
858Nm633lb-ft
737Nm544lb-ft
Curb weight
2,770kg6,107lb
2,436kg5,370lb
Gross weight
3,410kg7,518lb
2,974kg6,557lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
206 km/h
128 mph
To 99% top speed
49.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
35.8s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
4.2s
0-200 km/h
23.1s
Calculated
26.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
4.0s
Calculated
Quarter mile
13.1s
Calculated
12.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb
Calculated
232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
310Nm/t207lb-ft/ton
Calculated
303Nm/t202lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Length
5,125mm202in
4,775mm188in
Width
1,959mm77in
-
Height
1,718mm68in
1,629mm64in
Wheelbase
3,210mm126in
2,921mm115in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,696mm67in
Rear track
1,681mm66in
1,732mm68in
Ground clearance
222mm9in
180mm7in
Trunk volume
565L
476L
Max trunk volume
2,100L
918L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWhFiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
4.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
4.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.1 s
26.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Limited
206 km/h
128 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.9 s
10.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.1 s
12.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
169 km/h
105 mph
172 km/h
107 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh
544 hp
406 kW
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range
564 hp
421 kW

Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range has 20 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh and Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh
858 Nm
633 lb-ft
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range
737 Nm
544 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh
2,770 kg
6,107 lb
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range
2,436 kg
5,370 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range
206 km/h
128 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range and Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh
196 hp/t
146 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range
232 hp/t
173 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh
544 hp
406 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range
564 hp
421 kW
4.2 s
206 km/h
128 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWh
Power
544 hp
406 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
5,125 mm
201.8 in
Height
1,718 mm
67.6 in
FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
206 km/h
128 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
476 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,775 mm
188.0 in
Height
1,629 mm
64.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 125 kWhFiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range
Power
544 hp
406 kW
564 hp
421 kW
Torque
858 Nm
633 lb-ft
737 Nm
544 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
206 km/h
128 mph
Lightness
2,770 kg
6,107 lb
2,436 kg
5,370 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
5,125 mm
201.8 in
Height
1,718 mm
67.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
476 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,775 mm
188.0 in
Height
1,629 mm
64.1 in
Trunk score
565 L
20.0 cu ft
476 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
196 hp/t
146 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
232 hp/t
173 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Is 334 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh
Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 125 kWh vs Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range - car comparison - FastVsFaster