AUDI SQ6 e-tron
Car comparison
AUDI SQ6 e-tron 100 kWhvsFisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFisker Ocean
Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI SQ6 e-tron 100 kWh
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,350 kg5,181 lb
- Largest trunk514 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Most powerful564 hp421 kW
- Best power-to-weight232 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 517hp386kW | 564hp421kW |
| Torque | - | 737Nm544lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,350kg5,181lb | 2,436kg5,370lb |
| Gross weight | 2,965kg6,537lb | 2,974kg6,557lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 47.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 35.6s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.6s Calculated | 26.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 303Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,771mm188in | 4,775mm188in |
| Width | 1,965mm77in | 1,990mm78in |
| Height | 1,665mm66in | 1,629mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,893mm114in | 2,921mm115in |
| Front track | 1,676mm66in | 1,696mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,653mm65in | 1,732mm68in |
| Ground clearance | - | 180mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 514L | 476L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,517L | 918L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.6 s | 26.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Limited | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | 517 hp 386 kW |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 564 hp 421 kW |
Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range has 47 hp more than AUDI SQ6 e-tron 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI SQ6 e-tron 100 kWh and Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range: 47 hp (35 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | 2,350 kg 5,181 lb |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 2,436 kg 5,370 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 206 km/h 128 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | 4.4 s |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range and AUDI SQ6 e-tron 100 kWh: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | 517 hp 386 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | 564 hp 421 kW | 4.2 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh | FiskerOceanUltra 113 kWh Hyper Range | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 517 hp 386 kW | 564 hp 421 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 737 Nm 544 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,350 kg 5,181 lb | 2,436 kg 5,370 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 514 L 18.2 cu ft | 476 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI SQ6 e-tron 100 kWh
- Is 86 kg lighter
- Has 34 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Fisker Ocean Ultra 113 kWh Hyper Range
- Has 47 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























