Jaguar XJ220
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6vsFerrari F50 4.7 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari F50
4.7 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed342 km/h213 mph
- Most powerful542 hp404 kW
- Highest torque640 Nm472 lb-ft
- Best performance score91/100
Ferrari F50 4.7 V12
- Lightest1,230 kg2,712 lb
- Best power-to-weight423 hp/t315 kW/t2.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score75/100
- Best economy score32/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | FerrariF504.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 542hp404kW | 520hp388kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft | 471Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,350kg2,976lb | 1,230kg2,712lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,520kg3,351lb |
| Top speed | 342 km/h 213 mph | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.9s99% target: 339 km/h / 210 mph Calculated | 49.6s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.9s Calculated | 9.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 28.1L/100 km8.4mpg US10.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 41.5L/100 km5.7mpg US6.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 20.3L/100 km11.6mpg US13.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 401hp/t299kW/t182hp/1000 lb Calculated | 423hp/t315kW/t192hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 474Nm/t317lb-ft/ton Calculated | 383Nm/t256lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 374km232mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 4,698cc287cu in |
| Length | 4,930mm194in | 4,480mm176in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 1,986mm78in |
| Height | 1,150mm45in | 1,120mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,580mm102in |
| Front track | - | 1,620mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,602mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 115mm5in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 105L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6: Power / Torque
- Ferrari F50 4.7 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 7,200 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 8,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | FerrariF504.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 32.8 s | 35.0 s |
| Top speed | 342 km/h 213 mph | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 217 km/h 135 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 542 hp 404 kW |
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 520 hp 388 kW |
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 has 22 hp more than Ferrari F50 4.7 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari F50 4.7 V12 and Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 471 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 342 km/h 213 mph |
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 3.8 s |
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 and Ferrari F50 4.7 V12: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 401 hp/t 299 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 423 hp/t 315 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 542 hp 404 kW | 3.8 s | 342 km/h 213 mph |
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 520 hp 388 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariF504.7 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | FerrariF504.7 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 542 hp 404 kW | 520 hp 388 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 471 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 342 km/h 213 mph | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 28.1 L/100 km 8.4 mpg US 10.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 374 km 232 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 401 hp/t 299 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 423 hp/t 315 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari F50 4.7 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 28.1 L/100 km8.4 mpg US10.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 49.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 79.14 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 4,215 L1,113 US gal927 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 7,376 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 169 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
Ferrari F50 4.7 V12
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























