Car comparison

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6vsFerrari F50 4.7 V12

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XJ220

3.5 BiTurbo V6

542 hp3498 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe1992-1994
VS

Ferrari F50

4.7 V12

520 hp4698 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspirated1995-1997

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    342 km/h
    213 mph
  • Most powerful
    542 hp
    404 kW
  • Highest torque
    640 Nm
    472 lb-ft
  • Best performance score
    91/100

Ferrari F50 4.7 V12

  • Lightest
    1,230 kg
    2,712 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    423 hp/t
    315 kW/t
    2.4 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best economy score
    32/100
  • Best practicality score
    44/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6FerrariF504.7 V12
Power
542hp404kW
520hp388kW
Torque
640Nm472lb-ft
471Nm347lb-ft
Curb weight
1,350kg2,976lb
1,230kg2,712lb
Gross weight-
1,520kg3,351lb
Top speed
342 km/h
213 mph
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
53.9s99% target: 339 km/h / 210 mph
Calculated
49.6s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
9.9s
Calculated
9.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
28.1L/100 km8.4mpg US10.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
41.5L/100 km5.7mpg US6.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
20.3L/100 km11.6mpg US13.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.3s
Calculated
11.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
401hp/t299kW/t182hp/1000 lb
Calculated
423hp/t315kW/t192hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
474Nm/t317lb-ft/ton
Calculated
383Nm/t256lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
374km232mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,498cc213cu in
4,698cc287cu in
Length
4,930mm194in
4,480mm176in
Width
2,000mm79in
1,986mm78in
Height
1,150mm45in
1,120mm44in
Wheelbase
2,640mm104in
2,580mm102in
Front track-
1,620mm64in
Rear track-
1,602mm63in
Ground clearance-
115mm5in
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank-
105L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6Ferrari F50 4.7 V12PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6: Power / Torque
  • Ferrari F50 4.7 V12: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V67,200 rpm4,500 rpm7,450 rpm
FerrariF504.7 V128,500 rpm6,500 rpm8,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6FerrariF504.7 V12
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.9 s
9.9 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
32.8 s
35.0 s
Top speed
342 km/h
213 mph
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
7.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.7 s
9.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.3 s
11.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
217 km/h
135 mph
218 km/h
135 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
542 hp
404 kW
FerrariF504.7 V12
520 hp
388 kW

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 has 22 hp more than Ferrari F50 4.7 V12.

The biggest power difference is between Ferrari F50 4.7 V12 and Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6: 22 hp (16 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
640 Nm
472 lb-ft
FerrariF504.7 V12
471 Nm
347 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
1,350 kg
2,976 lb
FerrariF504.7 V12
1,230 kg
2,712 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
342 km/h
213 mph
FerrariF504.7 V12
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V63.8 s
FerrariF504.7 V123.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 and Ferrari F50 4.7 V12: 0.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
401 hp/t
299 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
FerrariF504.7 V12
423 hp/t
315 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
542 hp
404 kW
3.8 s
342 km/h
213 mph
FerrariF504.7 V12
520 hp
388 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
Power
542 hp
404 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
342 km/h
213 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,930 mm
194.1 in
Height
1,150 mm
45.3 in
FerrariF504.7 V12
Power
520 hp
388 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,480 mm
176.4 in
Height
1,120 mm
44.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6FerrariF504.7 V12
Power
542 hp
404 kW
520 hp
388 kW
Torque
640 Nm
472 lb-ft
471 Nm
347 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
3.9 s
Top speed
342 km/h
213 mph
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Lightness
1,350 kg
2,976 lb
1,230 kg
2,712 lb
Fuel consumption
-
28.1 L/100 km
8.4 mpg US
10.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,930 mm
194.1 in
Height
1,150 mm
45.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,480 mm
176.4 in
Height
1,120 mm
44.1 in
Range score
-
374 km
232 mi
Power-to-weight score
401 hp/t
299 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
423 hp/t
315 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFerrari F50 4.7 V12
Consumption28.1 L/100 km8.4 mpg US10.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km49.18 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi79.14 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used4,215 L1,113 US gal927 UK gal
Annual fuel cost7,376 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6

  • Has 22 hp more
  • Has 169 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Heaviest

Ferrari F50 4.7 V12

  • Is 120 kg lighter
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6
Ferrari F50 4.7 V12
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 vs Ferrari F50 4.7 V12 - car comparison - FastVsFaster