Rimac Nevera
Car comparison
Rimac Nevera 120 kWhvsFerrari 812 Superfast 6.5 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari 812 Superfast
6.5 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.0 s
- Fastest top speed412 km/h256 mph
- Most powerful1,914 hp1,427 kW
- Highest torque2,360 Nm1,741 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight890 hp/t664 kW/t1.1 kg/hp
- Best practicality score39/100
Ferrari 812 Superfast 6.5 V12
- Lightest1,630 kg3,594 lb
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best economy score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RimacNevera120 kWh | Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,914hp1,427kW | 800hp597kW |
| Torque | 2,360Nm1,741lb-ft | 718Nm530lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 1,630kg3,594lb |
| Top speed | 412 km/h 256 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 34.3s99% target: 408 km/h / 253 mph Calculated | 46.1s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.0s | 2.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 4.8s Calculated | 7.9s |
| 0-60 mph | 1.9s Calculated | 2.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 8.5s Calculated | 10.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 890hp/t664kW/t404hp/1000 lb Calculated | 491hp/t366kW/t223hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 1,098Nm/t734lb-ft/ton Calculated | 440Nm/t295lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 617km384mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 6,496cc396cu in |
| Length | 4,750mm187in | 4,657mm183in |
| Width | 1,986mm78in | 1,971mm78in |
| Height | 1,208mm48in | 1,276mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,745mm108in | 2,720mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,672mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,645mm65in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 92L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RimacNevera120 kWh | Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 1.9 s | 2.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.0 s | 2.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 4.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 11.1 s | 28.4 s |
| Top speed | 412 km/h 256 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.5 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 3.9 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 5.7 s | 6.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.2 s | 8.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 8.5 s | 10.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 284 km/h 176 mph | 231 km/h 143 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW |
| Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 | 800 hp 597 kW |
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh has 1,114 hp more than Ferrari 812 Superfast 6.5 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 812 Superfast 6.5 V12 and Rimac Nevera 120 kWh: 1,114 hp (831 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2,360 Nm 1,741 lb-ft |
| Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 | 718 Nm 530 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb |
| Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 412 km/h 256 mph |
| Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 | 340 km/h 211 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2.0 s |
| Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 | 2.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Rimac Nevera 120 kWh and Ferrari 812 Superfast 6.5 V12: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 890 hp/t 664 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp |
| Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 | 491 hp/t 366 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW | 2.0 s | 412 km/h 256 mph |
| Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 | 800 hp 597 kW | 2.9 s | 340 km/h 211 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RimacNevera120 kWh | Ferrari812 Superfast6.5 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW | 800 hp 597 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 2,360 Nm 1,741 lb-ft | 718 Nm 530 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.0 s | 2.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 412 km/h 256 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 617 km 384 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 890 hp/t 664 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp | 491 hp/t 366 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari 812 Superfast 6.5 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,911 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
- Has 1,114 hp more
- Has 1,642 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 72 km/h (45 mph) higher top speed
- Has 399 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Ferrari 812 Superfast 6.5 V12
- Is 520 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























