Mazda CX-60
Car comparison
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsExeed RX 2.0 TGDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonExeed RX
2.0 TGDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted219 km/h136 mph Restricted
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,094 km680 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score93/100
Exeed RX 2.0 TGDI
- Lightest1,865 kg4,112 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | ExeedRX2.0 TGDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 249hp186kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 385Nm284lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 1,865kg4,112lb |
| Gross weight | 2,516kg5,547lb | 2,237kg4,932lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 84.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 76.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.1s Calculated | 46.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,094km680mi Calculated | 855km531mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,283cc200cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,745mm187in | 4,775mm188in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,687mm66in | 1,671mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,870mm113in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | 1,642mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 175mm7in | 187mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 477L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,726L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 172g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
- Exeed RX 2.0 TGDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 3,750 rpm | 1,500-2,400 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| ExeedRX2.0 TGDI | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | ExeedRX2.0 TGDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.1 s | 46.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph Limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 254 hp 189 kW |
| ExeedRX2.0 TGDI | 249 hp 186 kW |
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 5 hp more than Exeed RX 2.0 TGDI.
The biggest power difference is between Exeed RX 2.0 TGDI and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| ExeedRX2.0 TGDI | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb |
| ExeedRX2.0 TGDI | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph |
| ExeedRX2.0 TGDI | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 7.4 s |
| ExeedRX2.0 TGDI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Exeed RX 2.0 TGDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| ExeedRX2.0 TGDI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Exeed RX 2.0 TGDI: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| ExeedRX2.0 TGDI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,094 km 680 mi |
| ExeedRX2.0 TGDI | 855 km 531 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 254 hp 189 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph |
| ExeedRX2.0 TGDI | 249 hp 186 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ExeedRX2.0 TGDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| ExeedRX2.0 TGDI |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| ExeedRX2.0 TGDI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| ExeedRX2.0 TGDI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | ExeedRX2.0 TGDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 249 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,094 km 680 mi | 855 km 531 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 172 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D | Exeed RX 2.0 TGDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 165 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 239 km (149 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Exeed RX 2.0 TGDI
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























