Car comparison

DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTechvsFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

DS 7 Crossback

1.6 PureTech

200 hp1598 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2019-2022
VS

Ford Puma

ST 1.5 EcoBoost

200 hp1496 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.6 L/100 km
    147.0 mpg US
    176.6 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    555 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelDS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200hp149kW
200hp149kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,825kg4,023lb
1,358kg2,994lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
1,815kg4,001lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
73.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
68.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
25.7s
Calculated
27.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1.6L/100 km147mpg US176.6mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton
Calculated
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
2,688km1,670mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,496cc91cu in
Length
4,573mm180in
4,226mm166in
Width
1,906mm75in
1,805mm71in
Height
1,625mm64in
1,520mm60in
Wheelbase
2,738mm108in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,621mm64in
-
Rear track
1,598mm63in
-
Ground clearance
190mm7in
152mm6in
Trunk volume
555L
456L
Max trunk volume
1,752L
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
43L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTechFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech6,000 rpm3,000 rpm6,250 rpm
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricDS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.7 s
27.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
161 km/h
100 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
200 hp
149 kW
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
1,825 kg
4,023 lb
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
1,358 kg
2,994 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
235 km/h
146 mph
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech5.9 s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 4.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
200 hp
149 kW
5.9 s
235 km/h
146 mph
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
6.7 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
555 L
19.6 cu ft
Length
4,573 mm
180.0 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
5.9 s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleDS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.7 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
1,825 kg
4,023 lb
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
Fuel consumption
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
555 L
19.6 cu ft
Length
4,573 mm
180.0 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Range score
2,688 km
1,670 mi
-
Trunk score
555 L
19.6 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleDS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTechFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Consumption1.6 L/100 km147 mpg US176.6 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km2.80 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi4.51 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used240 L63 US gal53 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost420.00 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech

  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 99 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 467 kg lighter
  • Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 PureTech
1.5i P300e
VS
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.6 PureTech
2.0 GME
VS
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 PureTech
40 TFSI
VS
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechvsAUDIQ2Facelift 202040 TFSI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
40 TDI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
1.6 PureTech
20d
VS
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechvsBMWX2 (F39)20d
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
1.6 PureTech
2.0 TDI
VS
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
1.6 PureTech
GLB 220d
VS
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
40 TDI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech vs Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster