DS 7 Crossback
Car comparison
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTechvsSubaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSubaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016
Sport 2.0 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions137 g/km
- Best estimated range1,033 km642 mi
- Largest trunk555 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225hp168kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,624kg3,580lb |
| Gross weight | 2,045kg4,508lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.1s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 79.1s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.3s Calculated | 36.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,033km642mi Calculated | 706km439mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,573mm180in | 4,595mm181in |
| Width | 1,895mm75in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,620mm64in | 1,735mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,738mm108in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | - | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,555mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 220mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 555L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 628L | 1,557L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 137g/km | 197g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
- Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,900 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T | 5,600 rpm | 2,400-3,600 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.3 s | 36.4 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 225 hp 168 kW |
| SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T | 240 hp 179 kW |
Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T has 15 hp more than DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech.
The biggest power difference is between DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech and Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T | 1,624 kg 3,580 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 8.3 s |
| SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T and DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech and Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 1,033 km 642 mi |
| SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T | 706 km 439 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 225 hp 168 kW | 8.3 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.5 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp 168 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,624 kg 3,580 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,033 km 642 mi | 706 km 439 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 137 g/km | 197 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 555 L 19.6 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech | Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
- Is 204 kg lighter
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 327 km (203 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
- Emits 60 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























