Car comparison

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsMini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Mini Aceman (J05)

JCW 54.2 kWh

258 hpElectricFWDAutomaticSUV2025-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    243 km/h
    151 mph
  • Most powerful
    265 hp
    198 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,675 kg
    3,693 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    158 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    83/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraTerramar2.0 TSIMiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
Power
265hp198kW
258hp192kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,675kg3,693lb
1,750kg3,858lb
Gross weight
2,290kg5,049lb
2,355kg5,192lb
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
67.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
56.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.4s
0-200 km/h
22.4s
Calculated
35.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
682km424mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
-
Length
4,519mm178in
4,079mm161in
Width
1,869mm74in
1,754mm69in
Height
1,586mm62in
1,514mm60in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,606mm103in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,519mm60in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,515mm60in
Ground clearance-
143mm6in
Trunk volume
540L
300L
Max trunk volume-
1,005L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIMini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWhPowerTorque
  • Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5,300-6,500 rpm1,650-4,350 rpm6,750 rpm
MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh5,000 rpm50-5,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraTerramar2.0 TSIMiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.4 s
35.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
258 hp
192 kW

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI has 7 hp more than Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
1,750 kg
3,858 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
243 km/h
151 mph
MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5.9 s
MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh6.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
5.9 s
243 km/h
151 mph
MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
258 hp
192 kW
6.4 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
Power
258 hp
192 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,079 mm
160.6 in
Height
1,514 mm
59.6 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraTerramar2.0 TSIMiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
Power
265 hp
198 kW
258 hp
192 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.4 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
1,750 kg
3,858 lb
Fuel consumption
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,079 mm
160.6 in
Height
1,514 mm
59.6 in
Range score
682 km
424 mi
-
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.78 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,310 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 75 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 33 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 240 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI vs Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster