Cupra Terramar
Car comparison
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsMini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Aceman (J05)
JCW 54.2 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,675 kg3,693 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 2,355kg5,192lb |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 56.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.4s Calculated | 35.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,519mm178in | 4,079mm161in |
| Width | 1,869mm74in | 1,754mm69in |
| Height | 1,586mm62in | 1,514mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,606mm103in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,519mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,515mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,005L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 5,000 rpm | 50-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.4 s | 35.9 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 258 hp 192 kW |
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI has 7 hp more than Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 5.9 s |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.9 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | MiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 33 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 240 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Mini Aceman (J05) JCW 54.2 kWh
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























