Cupra Terramar
Car comparison
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI · Stage 3vsCupra Terramar 2.0 TSI · Stage 2vsCupra Terramar 2.0 TSI · Stage 1vsCupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Terramar
2.0 TSI (Stage 2)
Cupra Terramar
2.0 TSI (Stage 1)
Cupra Terramar
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 306 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed253 km/h157 mph
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque496 Nm366 lb-ft
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Best power-to-weight184 hp/t137 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range750 km466 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW+102 hp | 265hp198kW+61 hp | 241hp180kW+37 hp | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 496Nm366lb-ft+176 Nm | 432Nm319lb-ft+112 Nm | 390Nm288lb-ft+70 Nm | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,665kg3,671lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 2,280kg5,027lb | 2,280kg5,027lb | 2,280kg5,027lb |
| Top speed | 253 km/h 157 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.3s99% target: 250 km/h / 156 mph-13.9 s Calculated | 68.5s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph-8.7 s Calculated | 71.7s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph-5.5 s Calculated | 77.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s-1.6 s | 6.0s-1.1 s | 6.4s-0.7 s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.2s-13.5 s Calculated | 22.8s-9.9 s Calculated | 25.9s-6.9 s Calculated | 32.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s-1.5 s Calculated | 5.7s-1.0 s Calculated | 6.1s-0.7 s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s-1.5 s Calculated | 14.1s-1.0 s Calculated | 14.5s-0.6 s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 184hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 298Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 750km466mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,519mm178in | 4,519mm178in | 4,519mm178in | 4,519mm178in |
| Width | 1,869mm74in | 1,869mm74in | 1,869mm74in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,586mm62in | 1,586mm62in | 1,586mm62in | 1,586mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,681mm106in | 2,681mm106in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,590mm63in | 1,590mm63in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,580mm62in | 1,580mm62in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 540L | 540L | 540L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L | 60L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 306 hp: Power / Torque
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 265 hp: Power / Torque
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 1) 241 hp: Power / Torque
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI 204 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.7 s | 6.1 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 6.0 s | 6.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.2 s | 22.8 s | 25.9 s | 32.8 s |
| Top speed | 253 km/h 157 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.2 s | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.3 s | 9.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.9 s | 12.2 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.1 s | 14.5 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp | 306 hp 228 kW |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp | 265 hp 198 kW |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp | 241 hp 180 kW |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp | 204 hp 152 kW |
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 306 hp has 102 hp more than Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI 204 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI 204 hp and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 306 hp: 102 hp (76 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp | 496 Nm 366 lb-ft |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp | 432 Nm 319 lb-ft |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp | 390 Nm 288 lb-ft |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp | 5.5 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp | 6.0 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp | 6.4 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 306 hp and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI 204 hp: 1.6 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 265 hp and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 1) 241 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp | 750 km 466 mi |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp | 750 km 466 mi |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp | 750 km 466 mi |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp | 750 km 466 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.5 s | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.0 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp | 241 hp 180 kW | 6.4 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.1 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 306 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 3)306 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 2)265 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI (Stage 1)241 hp | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI204 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | 241 hp 180 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 496 Nm 366 lb-ft | 432 Nm 319 lb-ft | 390 Nm 288 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 6.0 s | 6.4 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 253 km/h 157 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 750 km 466 mi | 750 km 466 mi | 750 km 466 mi | 750 km 466 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 306 hp | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 265 hp | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 1) 241 hp | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI 204 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 306 hp
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 64 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 265 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























