Car comparison

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

204 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2022-2025

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Lightest
    1,456 kg
    3,210 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    130 hp/t
    97 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    873 km
    542 mi
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraTerramar2.0 TSIVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
Power
204hp152kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,665kg3,671lb
1,456kg3,210lb
Gross weight
2,280kg5,027lb
2,040kg4,497lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
77.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
65.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
32.7s
Calculated
32.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
750km466mi
Calculated
873km542mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,519mm178in
4,236mm167in
Width
1,869mm74in
1,819mm72in
Height
1,586mm62in
1,582mm62in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,594mm102in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,547mm61in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,552mm61in
Ground clearance-
158mm6in
Trunk volume
540L
392L
Max trunk volume-
1,237L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIVolkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI4,500-6,000 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,250 rpm
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraTerramar2.0 TSIVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.7 s
32.9 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
95 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI has 14 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
1,456 kg
3,210 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
225 km/h
140 mph
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI7.1 s
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI6.8 s

Although Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI has more power, Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
750 km
466 mi
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
873 km
542 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
7.1 s
225 km/h
140 mph
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
6.8 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
392 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,236 mm
166.8 in
Height
1,582 mm
62.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.1 s
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraTerramar2.0 TSIVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
6.8 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
1,456 kg
3,210 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
392 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,236 mm
166.8 in
Height
1,582 mm
62.3 in
Range score
750 km
466 mi
873 km
542 mi
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
392 L
13.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Terramar 2.0 TSIVolkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,654 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 148 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI

  • Is 209 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 123 km (76 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
1.5 eTSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
S 2.0
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster