Cupra Terramar
Car comparison
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsAUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 40 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020
40 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score85/100
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TFSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,014 km630 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | - |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 80.6s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.7s Calculated | 35.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 750km466mi Calculated | 1,014km630mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,519mm178in | 4,682mm184in |
| Width | 1,869mm74in | 1,893mm75in |
| Height | 1,586mm62in | 1,662mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,819mm111in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,609mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,520L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 4,475-6,000 rpm | 1,450-4,375 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.7 s | 35.2 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TFSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TFSI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 750 km 466 mi |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 1,014 km 630 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.1 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.3 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 750 km 466 mi | 1,014 km 630 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI | AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TFSI
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 264 km (164 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























