Cupra Terramar
Car comparison
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsAUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q3 II (F3)
40 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score85/100
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range829 km515 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 83.6s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.7s Calculated | 40.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 750km466mi Calculated | 829km515mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,519mm178in | 4,484mm177in |
| Width | 1,869mm74in | 1,856mm73in |
| Height | 1,586mm62in | 1,616mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,576mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 530L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 3,500-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.7 s | 40.3 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 193 hp 144 kW |
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI has 11 hp more than AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 750 km 466 mi |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 829 km 515 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.1 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 750 km 466 mi | 829 km 515 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI | AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Has 11 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 79 km (49 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























