Car comparison

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsAUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

204 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

AUDI Q3 II (F3)

40 TDI

193 hp1968 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-2025

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    123 hp/t
    91 kW/t
    8.2 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,660 kg
    3,660 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    829 km
    515 mi
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraTerramar2.0 TSIAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
Power
204hp152kW
193hp144kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,665kg3,671lb
1,660kg3,660lb
Gross weight
2,280kg5,027lb
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
77.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
83.6s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
32.7s
Calculated
40.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
750km466mi
Calculated
829km515mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,519mm178in
4,484mm177in
Width
1,869mm74in
1,856mm73in
Height
1,586mm62in
1,616mm64in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,680mm106in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,584mm62in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,576mm62in
Trunk volume
540L
530L
Max trunk volume-
1,525L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIAUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDIPowerTorque
  • Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI4,500-6,000 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,250 rpm
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI3,500-4,200 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraTerramar2.0 TSIAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.7 s
40.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
95 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
193 hp
144 kW

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI has 11 hp more than AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
1,660 kg
3,660 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
225 km/h
140 mph
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI7.1 s
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI7.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
750 km
466 mi
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
829 km
515 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
7.1 s
225 km/h
140 mph
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
193 hp
144 kW
7.6 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
Power
193 hp
144 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,484 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,616 mm
63.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
Power
193 hp
144 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.1 s
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraTerramar2.0 TSIAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
193 hp
144 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.6 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,484 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,616 mm
63.6 in
Range score
750 km
466 mi
829 km
515 mi
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Terramar 2.0 TSIAUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 10 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Is 5 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 79 km (49 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI vs AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster