Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 2.0 TSIvsCupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Terramar
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,456 kg3,210 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score52/100
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range9,000 km5,592 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best economy score100/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,456kg3,210lb | 1,829kg4,032lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,420kg5,335lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 78.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.9s Calculated | 40.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 137Nm/t91lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 873km542mi Calculated | 9,000km5,592mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,236mm167in | 4,519mm178in |
| Width | 1,819mm72in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,582mm62in | 1,586mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,594mm102in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,547mm61in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,552mm61in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 158mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 392L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,237L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.9 s | 40.9 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW |
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI has 13 hp more than Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 1,829 kg 4,032 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI: 5.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 873 km 542 mi |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 9,000 km 5,592 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.8 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.3 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
| 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb | 1,829 kg 4,032 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 873 km 542 mi | 9,000 km 5,592 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI | Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 0.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 1.41 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 75 L20 US gal16 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 131.25 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 373 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
- Uses 5.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8,127 km (5,050 mi) more estimated range
- Has 58 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























