Car comparison

Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDIvsCupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Kodiaq II

2.0 TDI

193 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI

  • Fastest top speed
    217 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    193 hp
    144 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    879 km
    546 mi
  • Largest trunk
    845 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDICupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
193hp144kW
190hp142kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,974kg4,352lb
1,505kg3,318lb
Gross weight-
2,090kg4,608lb
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
88.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
70.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
43.7s
Calculated
40.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton
Calculated
213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
879km546mi
Calculated
655km407mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,758mm187in
4,381mm172in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,841mm72in
Height
1,656mm65in
1,625mm64in
Wheelbase
2,791mm110in
2,630mm104in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,572mm62in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,544mm61in
Ground clearance
187mm7in
-
Trunk volume
845L
485L
Max trunk volume
2,035L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
58L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDICupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI3,500-4,200 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,450 rpm
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDICupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
43.7 s
40.8 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
144 km/h
90 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
193 hp
144 kW
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI has 3 hp more than Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
1,974 kg
4,352 lb
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,505 kg
3,318 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
217 km/h
135 mph
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI8.0 s
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI7.2 s

Although Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI has more power, Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
98 hp/t
73 kW/t
10.2 kg/hp
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
879 km
546 mi
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
655 km
407 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
193 hp
144 kW
8.0 s
217 km/h
135 mph
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
Power
193 hp
144 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
845 L
29.8 cu ft
Length
4,758 mm
187.3 in
Height
1,656 mm
65.2 in
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
Power
193 hp
144 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
8.0 s
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
98 hp/t
73 kW/t
10.2 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDICupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
193 hp
144 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
7.2 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,974 kg
4,352 lb
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
Fuel consumption
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
845 L
29.8 cu ft
Length
4,758 mm
187.3 in
Height
1,656 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
Range score
879 km
546 mi
655 km
407 mi
Trunk score
845 L
29.8 cu ft
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
98 hp/t
73 kW/t
10.2 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDICupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.55 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.59 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used990 L262 US gal218 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,733 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 224 km (139 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 360 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Is 469 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
GLB 220d
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDIvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
GLA 220
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
1.6T
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDIvsHyundaiKona II1.6T
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI vs Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster