Car comparison

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-present
VS

Skoda Kodiaq II

2.0 TDI

193 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI

  • Most powerful
    193 hp
    144 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    879 km
    546 mi
  • Largest trunk
    910 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    212 km/h
    132 mph
  • Lightest
    1,505 kg
    3,318 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    126 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    50/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSISkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
Power
190hp142kW
193hp144kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,505kg3,318lb
1,925kg4,244lb
Gross weight
2,090kg4,608lb
-
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
70.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
79.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
40.8s
Calculated
48.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
100hp/t75kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
655km407mi
Calculated
879km546mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,381mm172in
4,758mm187in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,864mm73in
Height
1,625mm64in
1,657mm65in
Wheelbase
2,630mm104in
2,791mm110in
Front track
1,572mm62in
1,586mm62in
Rear track
1,544mm61in
1,575mm62in
Ground clearance-
187mm7in
Trunk volume
485L
910L
Max trunk volume-
2,105L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSISkoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI3,500-4,200 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSISkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.8 s
48.8 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
193 hp
144 kW

Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI has 3 hp more than Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
1,925 kg
4,244 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
212 km/h
132 mph
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI7.2 s
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI7.8 s

Although Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI has more power, Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
655 km
407 mi
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
879 km
546 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
212 km/h
132 mph
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
193 hp
144 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
Power
193 hp
144 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
910 L
32.1 cu ft
Length
4,758 mm
187.3 in
Height
1,657 mm
65.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
Power
193 hp
144 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.2 s
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSISkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
193 hp
144 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
7.8 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
1,925 kg
4,244 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
910 L
32.1 cu ft
Length
4,758 mm
187.3 in
Height
1,657 mm
65.2 in
Range score
655 km
407 mi
879 km
546 mi
Trunk score
485 L
17.1 cu ft
910 L
32.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSISkoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km11.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi18.59 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal990 L262 US gal218 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year1,733 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Is 420 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 224 km (139 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 425 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
GLB 220d
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDIvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
2.0 TDI
1.6T
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDIvsHyundaiKona II1.6T
2.0 TSI
GLA 220
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI vs Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster