Car comparison

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 2.0 D200

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-present
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023

2.0 D200

204 hp1997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200

  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    886 km
    550 mi
  • Largest trunk
    735 L
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    212 km/h
    132 mph
  • Lightest
    1,505 kg
    3,318 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    126 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSILand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
Power
190hp142kW
204hp152kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,505kg3,318lb
1,928kg4,251lb
Gross weight
2,090kg4,608lb
-
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
70.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
93.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
40.8s
Calculated
56.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
655km407mi
Calculated
886km550mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,381mm172in
4,797mm189in
Width
1,841mm72in
2,041mm80in
Height
1,625mm64in
1,683mm66in
Wheelbase
2,630mm104in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,572mm62in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,544mm61in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance-
214mm8in
Trunk volume
485L
735L
Max trunk volume-
1,798L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
62L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSILand Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200PowerTorque
  • Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D2003,750-4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSILand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.8 s
56.1 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
204 hp
152 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200 has 14 hp more than Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
1,928 kg
4,251 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
212 km/h
132 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI7.2 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D2008.3 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200 has more power, Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200 and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
655 km
407 mi
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
886 km
550 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
212 km/h
132 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
204 hp
152 kW
8.3 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
735 L
26.0 cu ft
Length
4,797 mm
188.9 in
Height
1,683 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.2 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSILand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200
Power
190 hp
142 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
8.3 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
1,928 kg
4,251 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
735 L
26.0 cu ft
Length
4,797 mm
188.9 in
Height
1,683 mm
66.3 in
Range score
655 km
407 mi
886 km
550 mi
Trunk score
485 L
17.1 cu ft
735 L
26.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSILand Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Is 423 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 231 km (144 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 250 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2.0 D200
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
2.0 D200
2.0d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
2.0 D200
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200vsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
2.0 D200
Standard Range 50 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200vsTeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.0 D200
25T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200vsCadillacGT425T
2.0 TSI
40 TFSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
2.0 D200
2.0 TFSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200vsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
GLA 220
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220
2.0 D200
40 TFSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI
Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 2.0 D200 - car comparison - FastVsFaster