AUDI Q5 III (GU)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 2.0 D200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023
2.0 D200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk735 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score92/100
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted226 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Lightest1,835 kg4,045 lb
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
- Best estimated range890 km553 mi
- Best performance score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,928kg4,251lb |
| Gross weight | 2,460kg5,423lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Calculated | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 107.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 93.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.4s Calculated | 56.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 890km553mi Calculated | 886km550mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,717mm186in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 2,041mm80in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,645mm65in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,637mm64in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 214mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 735L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,473L | 1,798L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 4,300-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 3,750-4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.4 s | 56.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 8.6 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200 and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 890 km 553 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 886 km 550 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.3 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 890 km 553 mi | 886 km 550 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 735 L 26.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Is 93 kg lighter
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 km (3 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 215 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























