Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 2.0 D200vsHyundai Kona II 1.6T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHyundai Kona II
1.6T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Largest trunk735 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Hyundai Kona II 1.6T
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | HyundaiKona II1.6T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 198hp148kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,928kg4,251lb | 1,460kg3,219lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,885kg4,156lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 93.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 81.0s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 56.1s Calculated | 52.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 886km550mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,797mm189in | 4,350mm171in |
| Width | 2,041mm80in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,683mm66in | 1,585mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,663mm65in | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 214mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 735L | 466L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,798L | 1,300L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 47L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200: Power / Torque
- Hyundai Kona II 1.6T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 3,750-4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | HyundaiKona II1.6T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 56.1 s | 52.4 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 198 hp 148 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200 has 6 hp more than Hyundai Kona II 1.6T.
The biggest power difference is between Hyundai Kona II 1.6T and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 8.3 s |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200 and Hyundai Kona II 1.6T: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.3 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 198 hp 148 kW | 8.7 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HyundaiKona II1.6T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 D200 | HyundaiKona II1.6T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 198 hp 148 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 886 km 550 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 735 L 26.0 cu ft | 466 L 16.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 D200
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 165 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 269 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Hyundai Kona II 1.6T
- Is 468 kg lighter
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























